Purposeful Engagement for Better Longevity
Dr. Philip Pizzo asks to think about how we can best explore longevity from the perspective of aligning our long-term health with our lifespans. Living longer, how do we ensure we have sufficient quality of life? Wellbeing, equity, social cohesion, personal security, and productivity are all critical considerations. Skillsets, and the time at which we learn and acquire them, will shift. Education, among other parameters, will increasingly happen on a spectrum of age. A key factor is how to maintain purpose, both self and externally directed, and social engagement later in life. Data show just how essential these metrics are in contributing to better long-term wellness, requiring proactive community effort.
 00.00
 it is now my great pleasure to introduce  my esteemed colleague professor Philippi  so who will talk about the distinguished  careers  [Music]  well good afternoon good morning it's  wonderful to be here with you today I'd  like to focus our attention on this  evolving change that's taking place that  we've been hearing about from the very  visionary work that Laura Carstensen has  done and the extraordinary contributions  that Andrew Scott has just revealed to  us I think the question that governs the  conversation is not just about aging and  longevity but how do we think about  individually and collectively aligning  our health spans with our life spans  regardless of how long we live how do we 
 01.00
 make sure that we have the highest  quality that we can accomplish during  our lives we can think about this from  an individual perspective we can think  about it from an institutional  perspective and also from a societal  perspective for example the Hartford  Foundation has recently come up with the  societal aging index and they've looked  at a number of variables that contribute  to how societies including countries  will do for example well-being measures  of how disability free aging will take  place equity what's the degree of  poverty and educational attainment  cohesion what's the degree of  intergenerational interactions that take  place what about what about our  productivity  um how well are we doing is we take on  new tasks during aging and security how  safe do we feel um what's the degree of  protection you know for us so when we  think about the societal changes I'm 
 02.02
 going to come back to that a little bit  later in the presentation but I want to  frame this in a broader question that  relates to our life transitions and  specifically it builds on this thesis as  we construct our lives how do we  continue to develop new skills as we  move through them now we all know that  universities have been doing much the  same thing since the 11th century  they've been educating young people at  the beginning of their lives the  question that I'd like to pose for you  today is what rolled  they play as we migrate through our  lives how could we for example learn all  we need to know in our early 20s and  even into our 30s we heard extraordinary  presentations this morning on changes in  science and technology will him more  about biology and oncology later today  and we need to think about how can we  regain or accomplish some of these new 
 03.00
 skill sets later in our life and by here  I mean during our midlife generally in  the period from our 40s to our 50s to  our 60s and 70s and and beyond so an  important thesis is can we use our  universities to come back to and re  acquaint ourselves with new skill sets  that will enable us to lead our lives  more successfully with wellness and  lifespan being connected we began an  experiment about this at Stanford  University in 2015 when we enrolled our  first class into what we call the  Stanford distinguished careers Institute  I'm gonna tell you a little bit more  about that in a few moments but I want  to frame the context for it first I want  to begin by just thinking about some of  the epidemiological data that helps to  gird the principles that underlie what  were attempting to achieve there's some  really profound data that came out of  from a study from n case and Angus  Deaton who won the Nobel Prize in  Economics just a couple of years ago 
 04.01
 that has looked at what's happening in  the United States in terms of this  longevity equation and one of the things  that was observed in that study which  went from 1999 to 2013 is that while  it's true that many people are  benefiting from longevity there is one  group that's not and that is none  Hispanic White's men and women who've  had a high school education or less who  are largely living in the Midwest or  south who are actually dying early why  are they dying they're dying because of  opioids they're dying because of suicide  they're dying because they have a sense  of hopelessness around them they've lost  purpose which is really an important  point and I think when you couple that  with additional data that comes from and  receptor that tells us  that not only purpose but social  engagement is really critically  important one begins to think about some  of the contributing factors that may  lead to a more successful lifespan when 
 05.02
 you add to that further from the studies  that Raj Chetty at Stanford has done  that has looked at which parts of the  United States map to having a more  successful life journey it turns out  that those parts of the United States  that do tend to be around the perimeters  they tend to include not only  socioeconomic status but equally  important lifestyle changes so here we  begin to think about some of the  correlates that might be important for  us to consider when we think about  lifespan and health span purpose  community social engagement and wellness  drilling down a little bit further into  that when you think about purpose the  work of Bill de Minh is really pretty  important he's identified purpose in two  ways what we do for ourselves and how we  do beyond ourselves so he studied this  in adolescents and youngsters from 12 to  24 years of age and determined that 
 06.00
 about 20% of individuals actually have a  sense of purpose beyond themselves about  almost 25 percent do not have a sense of  purpose at all  now I'm sure everyone in this room does  have a sense of purpose the rest are  dabblers and dreamers but he went back  with an Colby and began to look at some  of these same metrics as it relates to  people in midlife and here he studied  another 1200 individuals and it turns  out that about a third actually have a  sense of purpose that goes beyond the  self there is those who have a sense of  purpose for themselves  financial security the nature their job  how they engage in their community but  there are those who extend that beyond  themselves to things that have a broader  societal impact do they want to change  the world do they want to do something  that extends what they know to others  they they want to have an impact on  other people in their community  so purpose is critically important and 
 07.00
 we know correlates with a highly  successful  in fact all-purpose morbidity and  mortality correlates with those who have  a positive sense of purpose and there is  large bodies of data that increasingly  support on this particular contribution  so purpose and we heard a great  presentation this morning about the  impact of purpose on our communities so  that is so significant and inspirational  when we think about the second important  factor of social engagement I think  about the Harvard study that followed or  now over 80 years 268 individuals men of  course at the time who began Harvard and  who were followed during their lifetimes  to see what correlated with a positive  outcome and what did correlate with a  positive outcome were a variety of  different factors that speak to  happiness do you have a successful  marriage as you move for your life do  you have close connections with your 
 08.01
 children and your community and family  is your life relatively stress-free and  secure these are the correlates that  make a big difference in terms of social  engagement and that's coupled with some  other very important data a recent  publication is demonstrated in over  400,000 cases based upon a series of  meta analyses that in that the that  people who have social engagement have a  50% increase in survival and those who  lack it have about a 30% increase in  their likelihood for developing  cardiovascular or neurodegenerative  disease so purpose community really  important in terms of social engagement  and then the third of course is wellness  when we think about wellness of course  we tend to think about our activities in  terms of a biology but I would like to  share with you that equally important  and even perhaps more so our lifestyle  changes and the environment that we're 
 09.00
 part of and we know that when measures  of purpose have been articulated of of  wellness have been articulated that it  turns out that community is probably the  single most important factor  followed by lifestyle followed by a  stress-free  life followed by purpose these are the  important metrics that one tends to look  at in this particular arena so it's  based upon these three factors purpose  social engagement and wellness that we  began configuring the pilot program that  we started at Stanford that in 2015 that  I'd now like to describe for you briefly  if I can have the slide that shows the  program so this is called the Stanford  distinguished careers Institute and I  want to share with you just a few parts  about it and then take you beyond it to  what I hope will become much more of a  national and global effort and it's  asking the question what's the role of  the University and taking individuals 
 10.02
 like you in this room and bringing you  back and allow you to reignite your  sense of purpose to re-engage your  social connectedness and to recalibrate  your sense of wellness and if we can do  that on an individual level  can we actually compress your morbidity  can we shift to the right and reduce the  time during which the normal  consequences of Aging might take place  that's the fundamental thesis behind  this program how do we do it  we're taking individuals in midlife and  asking them if they are interested in  applying to our program to tell us which  of eight purpose pathways they'd be  interested in pursuing things like arts  and humanities business and  entrepreneurship engineering sciences  environmental issues international  policy and the like and we bring them to  Stanford for a year-long program where  we align them in small groups with a 
 11.01
 faculty advisor and then allow them to  take classes across the university now  these are not separate classes these are  sitting side-by-side with undergraduate  and graduate students because this is  another critical part of what we're  exploring can we transform the nature of  higher education to foster  intergenerational learning and teaching  rather than having a separation of the  age bands why not bring them together  and then  act what we're observing is an  incredible amount of interactive  mentoring and sharing of ideas among  young people and people in mid life so  this is a key part of the equation and  we couple that with ways of building  community of bringing our fellows  together and allowing them to learn from  and about each other using the art of  storytelling as a mechanism for engaging  in their life journey we bring them  together for different interactions with  faculty leaders for colloquia in fact on 
 12.01
 Wednesday of this week and quite  pursuant to the topic of this morning  we'll be spending the whole day on  artificial intelligence and then for  various kinds of community activities  and then with our wellness programs we  work with Stanford medicine to really  think about how we can recalibrate that  sense of wellness so people have the  endurance to traverse the life journey  going forward now we view this project  or this program as the beginning as I  alluded to earlier of what we hope will  become much more of a national and  global transformation the question we're  asking is shouldn't all or most colleges  and universities large and small  community colleges well engage in ways  of bringing people back to recalibrate  their lives and reignite their sense of  purpose and if we can do that and some a  that on to a larger scale um can we not  only compress individual morbidity but 
 13.00
 can we have a larger impact on the  societal consequences the fundamental  question that we're asking which will be  longitudinal of course is over time can  we see a reduction in the need for  medical and social services as people  age and do better with their lives I  think that this is a critically  important question for all of us as  we've heard from Laura and from Andrew  we are witnessing the greatest change  that society has yet rendered it is  going to be 20 percent in the United  States of individuals older than 65 but  in parts of Europe and Asia it's going  to be 35 to 40  and how our society is going to  calibrate these kinds of interactions  how are we going to avoid a tilt of  resource allocations and I think at  least one step toward that is to begin  to rethink this trilogy of education  work and retirement and spread it out 
 14.02
 through the course of one's life rather  than compartmentalizing our lives into  different sectors why not think about  them as being more of a continuum why  not utilize the opportunity to gain new  knowledge as a way of creating new  opportunities some of which will be new  jobs new volunteer activities new  contributions to communities and new  ways of being able to protect our  society as we move through this next  very exciting phase so thank you very  much for listening me today and I'll be  more than happy to speak with you as  well later during the day thank you  [Applause] 




 
  
  
  
 